Since Mursi was the first ever
elected president of Egypt the Egyptians very plainly, expected that it will
bring a positive change to their lives. They were supposed to have freedom of
expression and so other democratic rights. But on 22 November 2012 Mr. Mursi
put a presidential decree that could not be appealed, a power not even Mubarak
had. That decree gave him a supreme power above any any person. He was forced
to rescind the decree a few weeks later. Although the move unquestionably
smells of authoritarianism and has been universally criticized, it can be
argued that, to some degree, Mursi’s seemingly undemocratic move was triggered
by a series of actions by the courts that undermined his legitimate powers. There
had been some salient features of Mursi’s misrule. Those include- the use of
violence and even torture against protestors by MB supporters during riots in
front of Mursi’s palace on December 2012; Massive media censorship; Investigation for high treason,
claimed by the government, of several leaders of the opposition. MB owned media
have also spread accusations that opposition leaders like Amr Moussa spy for
Israel and are part of a US-orchestrated plot to overthrow the government.
Mursi’s blatant intention to
consolidate power in an authoritarian manner took him into the ditch of hell.
The politics of Egypt is based on republicanism, with a
semi-presidential system of government. Like many other modern states there are
three branches of state in Egypt- legislative, executive and judiciary. But
military wing, Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), is the most powerful
above all of them. Military officers in fact, have been ruling the country
since 1952 by toppling monarchic system. Following the Egyptian Revolution in
2011 it was widely expected that there would be breakthrough. The revolution was initially successful since it
forced President Hosni Mubarak to resign but could not free Egypt from the
clutches of the SCAF. This time SCAF grabbed executive power with popular
support. It dissolved the parliament and suspended the constitution. This
situation sustained until Mursi assumed to power in 2012 through an election. But Mursi, the first ever democratically
elected president of Egypt could not stay more than a year. This time Fattah Al
Sisi the Commander-in-Chief of the Egyptian Armed Forces produced a successful
coup to overthrow Mursi amidst a longstanding political crisis including fierce
street battle with pro-Mursi supporters on one side and anti-Morsi on the
other.
Hillel Frisch assumes
that the unique role of the military in Egypt is even more disconcerting. In
Egypt, the armed forces have assumed, contrary to the existing constitution, a
guardian role, similar to the Turkish model before the ascendance of the
government Justice and Development Party in which the army does not only
protect the state against outside competitors but maintains the regime internally
as well.
In history it is found
that since Colonel Gamal Abd-al Nasser’s absolute rise to power in the mid-
1950s, the Egyptian armed forces have neither ruled nor played the role of the
guardian of the Egyptian regime. Under Mubarak the army was privileged yet
subordinated. This situation had been continued until newly elected President Muhammad
Morsi subordinated the Army to his rule in August 2012.
The military is very influential in Egypt's domestic
affairs, politically and economically. Approximately 30% of the Egyptian
economy is dominated by the military. It is also well-integrated into the
political system in Egypt. However, it has given signs to indicate its support
of the demands of the Egyptian people. In its statement deposing Morsi, the
military denied engaging in a coup d'état, indicating that it does not
intend to run the government. Rather, the military’s actions seem to reinforce
what it sees as its traditional role as the “Guardian of the Republic”.
There are also indications that the MB sought to
slowly replace the old military leadership with elements that, for personal or
ideological reasons, were more sympathetic to the movement. That reshuffle also
created discontent in armed forces.
Since it is clear that the Egyptian military quarter
had been enjoying a privileged life and well control over the country until
Morsi entered into the scene they were looking for a continuation of their past
supremacy even during the Morsi period. Eventually this section was looking for
changing the status quo. Finally
internal factors i.e. political unrest and external factors i.e. green signal
from a western superpower assisted them to fulfill its desire.
This article was appeared first on 23rd August, 2013 on the Daily Sun (Link- http://www.daily-sun.com/details_yes_23-08-2013_Military-dynamics-in-Egypt-crisis_593_2_5_1_1.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment